Publish manuscript:Please read the guidelines for writers

By hypak Write Essay For Me No Comments

The key concern of Tobacco Control would be to give a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which can be more likely to further the objectives of the comprehensive tobacco control policy. The introduction should indicate why the research reported or issues discussed are important in terms of controlling tobacco use, and the discussion section should include an analysis of how the research reported contributes to tobacco control objectives in papers submitted for review.

Documents firmly anchored to a strategic policy and programme context are more inclined to be accepted for book. Due to the fact log seeks to achieve a readership that is international writers should think about whether their intended submissions target dilemmas or themes, that are apt to be of great interest to scientists employed in other countries. Overly parochial dilemmas, that have few lessons for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are not likely to be provided with priority that is high. The manuscripts editors will generally maybe maybe maybe not offer priority that is high:

  • Studies of smoking prevalence and its particular correlates. They are most suitable to nationwide journals. Few individuals residing outside nation have an interest in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette cigarette cigarette smokers.
  • Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific populace teams or medical researchers. Once more, they are better suited to national journals or even health speciality that is professional. Few individuals far away could be enthusiastic about (for instance) whether nurses in a hospital that is regional thinking about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and people using studies that are such initial areas are of more interest.
  • Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are papers with findings that appear to hold no obvious value for changing policy or training in tobacco control. They frequently show methodological finery, but don’t take us anywhere essential or interesting.
  • Advice pieces where in actuality the viewpoints are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or neglect for crucial ethical dilemmas in favor of sloganeering.
  • Documents that show the writers have not exposed Tobacco Control nor comprehend its focus that is primary on control in place of on tobacco and its particular usage and wellness effects. We have been enthusiastic about such documents, but as long as their writers address the implications of the findings for tobacco control.
  • Papers with glaringly apparent, deadly methodological issues.
  • Documents on topics that need very technical or language that is discipline-specific to be grasped by the almost all visitors.
  • Documents that are replications of currently well-established findings or provide little information that is new.
  • Local studies in which the implications for the journal’s international market are not clear.
  • Reports written for governments or neighborhood wellness authorities that someone thought could be provided an instant make-over and submitted as a journal paper.

Editorial policy

Tobacco Control adheres to your greatest requirements concerning its editorial policies on book ethics, medical misconduct, permission and peer review criteria. To see all BMJ Journal policies please make reference to the BMJ Author Hub policies web web page.

Articles are posted under a special licence or non-exclusive licence for UK Crown workers or where BMJ has agreed CC BY is applicable. The terms are as stated in accordance with our licence terms for US Federal Government officers or employees acting as part of their official duties. Writers or their employers retain copyright. Start access articles may be reused beneath the regards to the appropriate imaginative Commons licence to facilitate reuse for the content; please refer to the Tobacco Control Author Licence for the applicable Creative Commons licences”.

Tobacco industry funded work

Tobacco Control will perhaps not start thinking about for book documents reporting work funded, in whole or in part, by a tobacco business or tobacco industry company. Nor will the consider that is journal by writers who accept tobacco industry financing, including money for research expenses, for several or section of any author’s income, or other kinds of individual remuneration. For more information, please check this out editorial providing the reasoning behind the journal’s policy. Failure to declare interests that are competing distribution, or whenever a write-up is commissioned, can lead to instant rejection for the paper. In case a interest that is competing to light after book, Tobacco Control will issue an official modification to or retraction regarding the entire paper, as appropriate.

Material previously published online

Tobacco Control is prepared to give consideration to documents based wholly or in component on product previously posted on the web. Nevertheless writers should think about an editorial about this topic: Prior book on the net: brand brand new log policy. The editor keeps the right that is customary make changes however you like if necessary to reduce, aided by the approval regarding the author(s), material accepted for publication. Any written or illustrative product that happens to be posted somewhere else needs to be duly recognized and associated with the penned consent for the copyright owner (this might be the publisher as opposed to the author).

Fast monitoring

Under unique circumstances where a paper’s findings have actually straight away policy that is relevant warranting urgent book, manuscripts could be fast tracked prior to the normal queue of documents. In the event which you feel you feel it is of sufficient importance to be handled urgently that you have good reasons why this is true for your paper, please detail these in a cover i need someone to write my essay letter, explaining the importance of your work for the field and the reason. This demand will not guarantee that the editors will concur, and just a few documents per year will soon be expedited with this basis, however it can help the editors to judge the paper’s value when you look at the present context.

Formatting, terms and revised manuscripts

Papers on electric cigarettes should utilize the term ‘electronic cigarettes’ on first usage, after which it the abbreviation ‘e-cigarettes’ may be utilized. Documents on other delivery that is nicotine may continue steadily to make use of the definition of ‘electronic smoking delivery systems’ accompanied by the abbreviation ‘ENDS’ after very very first usage.

Whenever uploading a revised manuscript, writers also needs to consist of a different manuscript file showcasing the tracked changes to exhibit the editors the huge difference through the previous variation. The monitored modifications document is uploaded as a supplementary file.

Analysis reporting gu >

BMJ calls for conformity to your reporting that is following. Please upload the appropriate completed list for the submission to your study type, and label it “Research checklist”. This can be indicated on the submission form if no relevant checklist is available for your study type.

CONSORT statement – necessary for all randomised managed studies
PRISMA statement – necessary for all systematic reviews
EVEREST statement – Required for several financial evaluations
STARD statement – Required for many diagnostic research papers
STROBE statement – necessary for all observational studies
SQUIRE statement – Required for many quality enhancement studies

Guidance and types can be obtained from EQUATOR.

We welcome video clip abstracts to come with accepted research articles. These enable authors to actually talk through their work beyond the limitations of a article that is formal improve the user’s understanding. Note you to consider submitting a video abstract until your paper has been accepted that we will not ask. Please do not try to upload a video clip abstract upon initial distribution of the manuscript.

There are numerous tutorials online which could guide the creation of a video clip abstract, using widely and sometimes easily available pc software. Windows film Maker and Apple iMovie will be the many typical examples. Samples of movie abstracts can be obtained from The BMJ. Here are a guidelines that are few making a video clip abstract. Writers could also like to ask their institution’s press/media office for help.

  • Video abstracts must not go longer than 4 mins.
  • The information and concentrate regarding the movie must connect straight to the research which has been accepted for publication, and really should maybe maybe maybe not stray beyond the information. We suggest itself i.e. briefly outline the background/context of the study, present your research objective, outline the methods used, present the key results and then discuss the implications of the outcomes that you follow the same structure as the paper.
  • The presentation and content regarding the video clip must be in a mode as well as in terms that’ll be understandable and available to a broad audience that is medical. The language that is main be English, but we welcome subtitles an additional language. Please avoid jargon that’ll not be acquainted to a broad medical market, and don’t utilize abbreviations.
  • Authors frequently talk straight into the digital digital camera and/or present a slideshow, but we enable the utilization of other appropriate artistic and material that is audiosuch as for example animations, movies, nevertheless photographs, figures, infographics). Should you want to make use of product from formerly posted work or off their sources, please receive the appropriate permissions through the publisher that is relevant copyright owner.